I think we can't be overly dogmatic in economics because certain things may work for one system and other things may not work in another system and so forth. Economics is a very complex system and is essentially human life and the behavior of humans. So to build one theory around it is probably wrong. Sure I am leaning more to the Austrian school, particularly when it comes to debt cycles. But I have sympathy for the Keynesian approach if, and this is a big question, IF it is implemented properly.
In other words, the business cycles will lead to excursions of prosperity and during these excursions into prosperity the system should build up reserves. Then when the excursion in depressions occurs below the trend line, use these reserves. But the problem with Keynesian economics has been that in the excursions into depression the reserves were always used but were never accumulated in the periods of prosperity, and so you build up larger and larger government debt and print more money; that is the problem. It's the problem of democracy. - in Lew Rockwell.com
Marc Faber is an international investor known for his uncanny predictions of the stock market and futures markets around the world.
